| block | nitrogen | subplot | variety | wplot | yield | column | row | nrate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.6_cwt | 1 | Marvellous | 1 | 156 | 1 | 1 | 0.6 |
| 1 | 0.4_cwt | 2 | Marvellous | 1 | 118 | 2 | 1 | 0.4 |
| 1 | 0.2_cwt | 3 | Marvellous | 1 | 140 | 1 | 2 | 0.2 |
| 1 | 0_cwt | 4 | Marvellous | 1 | 105 | 2 | 2 | 0.0 |
| 1 | 0_cwt | 1 | Victory | 2 | 111 | 1 | 3 | 0.0 |
| 1 | 0.2_cwt | 2 | Victory | 2 | 130 | 2 | 3 | 0.2 |
ASR014. LMM for a split-plot design with covariates - Oats varieties
The complete script for this example can be downloaded here:
Dataset
The model that we will fit here is based on the D011 dataset, and the first few rows are presented below:
Model
In this example we will fit a LMM with the full structure of a split-plot design. The specification of the model is: \[ y = \mu + variety + nitrogen + variety:nitrogen + block + block:wplot +e\ \]
where,\(y\) is the yield of oats,
\(\mu\) is the overall mean,
\(variety\) is the fixed effect of variety,
\(nitrogen\) is the fixed effect of the level of nitrogen,
\(variety:nitrogen\) is the fixed effect of the interaction between variaty and nitrogen,
\(block\) is the random effect of block, with \(block \sim \mathcal{N}(0,\,\sigma^{2}_{b})\),
\(block:wplot\) is the nested random effect of plot within blocks, with \(block:wplot \sim \mathcal{N}(0,\,\sigma^{2}_{w})\),
\(e\) is the random residual effect, with \(e \sim \mathcal{N}(0,\,\sigma^{2}_{e})\).Now, let’s take a look at how to write the model with ASReml-R. Note that before fitting the model, variety, nitrogen, block, and wplot need to be set as factors.
asr014 <- asreml(
fixed = yield ~ variety + nitrogen + variety:nitrogen,
random = ~block + block:wplot,
residual = ~units,
data = d011
)This model can also be written in abbreviated form as:
asr014 <- asreml(
fixed = yield ~ variety*nitrogen,
random = ~block/wplot,
residual = ~units,
data = d011
)Exploring output
Let’s take a look at the ANOVA table:
wald(asr014, denDF = 'numeric')$Wald Df denDF F.inc Pr
(Intercept) 1 5 245.1000 1.931823e-05
variety 2 10 1.4850 2.723869e-01
nitrogen 3 45 37.6900 2.457701e-12
variety:nitrogen 6 45 0.3028 9.321988e-01
Here we can see that only the facotr that is significant for yield is nitrogen. Note also the degrees of freedom that describe the hierarchical structure of the experiment as describes a split-plot design.
The variance components estimated from this model are:
summary(asr014)$varcomp component std.error z.ratio bound %ch
block 214.4906 168.66037 1.271731 P 0.1
block:wplot 106.0686 67.88201 1.562543 P 0.0
units!R 177.0946 37.33601 4.743266 P 0.0
Lets obtain the predicted means, based on the above model for the combination of variety:nitrogen:
predict(asr014, classify = 'variety:nitrogen')$pvals variety nitrogen predicted.value std.error status
1 Golden_rain 0_cwt 80.00000 9.106977 Estimable
2 Golden_rain 0.2_cwt 98.50000 9.106977 Estimable
3 Golden_rain 0.4_cwt 114.66667 9.106977 Estimable
4 Golden_rain 0.6_cwt 124.83333 9.106977 Estimable
5 Marvellous 0_cwt 86.66667 9.106977 Estimable
6 Marvellous 0.2_cwt 108.50000 9.106977 Estimable
7 Marvellous 0.4_cwt 117.16667 9.106977 Estimable
8 Marvellous 0.6_cwt 126.83333 9.106977 Estimable
9 Victory 0_cwt 71.50000 9.106977 Estimable
10 Victory 0.2_cwt 89.66667 9.106977 Estimable
11 Victory 0.4_cwt 110.83333 9.106977 Estimable
12 Victory 0.6_cwt 118.50000 9.106977 Estimable
But more relevant are the predictions for the only significant factor:
preds <- predict(asr014, classify = 'nitrogen')$pvals nitrogen predicted.value std.error status
1 0_cwt 79.38889 7.17471 Estimable
2 0.2_cwt 98.88889 7.17471 Estimable
3 0.4_cwt 114.22222 7.17471 Estimable
4 0.6_cwt 123.38889 7.17471 Estimable